Fund index
XLK
6 articles on this site analyse XLK — 1 of them head-on.
Measured concentration
as of 2026-06-30XLK reports 78 positions, but the weights make it behave like about 16.3 equally weighted ones. Computed by this site from the fund's SEC Form N-PORT filing — see what this measure does not tell you and the full table.
Most often compared against
1Measures applied to it
5All articles
6-
XLC vs VOX: The Communication-Services Sector — Where Big Tech Hides in Plain Sight
XLC and VOX both label themselves "communication services," but the sector is functionally a large-cap growth vehicle: Meta, Alphabet, and Netflix dominate...
-
CIBR vs BUG vs HACK: Cybersecurity ETFs — Where the Holdings and Fees Diverge
All three funds sell the same story — pure-play cybersecurity exposure — but their five-year realized returns span a wide range (7.2% to 14.7% CAGR), and...
-
EWY vs EWT vs KWEB: The Geography of the AI Chip Trade
"Korea," "Taiwan," and "China internet" are marketing labels; under the hood, EWY is largely a memory-chip bet, EWT is a TSMC-centric logic-foundry bet, and...
-
VGT vs XLK: Two Large Technology ETFs — Where the 0.10% Fee Gap Goes
The fee gap is one basis point (VGT 0.09%, XLK 0.08%), not the ten the headline framing usually implies — cost is not where these two funds actually...
-
IGV vs WCLD vs QQQ: Breaking Down the 'Tech Beta' Stack
IGV, WCLD, and QQQ are sold as "tech ETFs" but they are not interchangeable. QQQ is a diversified large-cap growth index, IGV is a concentrated software...
-
BOTZ vs. ROBO vs. AIQ: Three AI & Robotics ETFs Compared
The three funds share a marketing category but not a portfolio: AIQ's 5-year CAGR of 17.2% comes mostly from mega-cap semiconductors and hyperscalers, not...
Mentions are detected across the full text of every article, so an appearance may be a passing comparison rather than the subject. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell — see the disclaimer.